08.07.2026 Serial no. 20 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 2797 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with ST No. 01(12)/2025 arising out of Sessions Case No. 271 of 2025 corresponding to Baishanabnagar PS Case No. 1356 of 2024 dated 04.12.2024 u/s 179/180/61(2) of the BNS, 2023. -And- In the matter of : Jehelu Sekh @ Jehelu Sk. @ Jeheul Sk. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Kalidas Saha Ms. Khushi Mollick Mr. D. K. Chauhan … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Somnath Adhikary … for the State-respondent(s) The subject-matter of the case relates to alleged recovery of Rs. 1,86,000/- of FICN and charge-sheet has already been submitted. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that only one witness till date has been examined out of the 15 witnesses cited in the charge-sheet. It has also been contended that there is no possibility of the trial being concluded in the near future, as such, learned advocate prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail on any stringent condition. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the quantum of seizure in the present case. 2 Having regard to the same, as a matter of last chance, six months’ more time is granted to the prosecution to complete the relevant witnesses. At this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2797 of 2025 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)