APHC010674872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34911/2025 Between: M ANNAPOORNA, W/O. M. SUNDARA RAJA, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC COOLI, R/O. VENKATADASARIPALLE VILLAGE, R. KUMMARAPALLI POST, PULICHERLA MANDAI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522020. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALLUR POLICE STATION, PULICHERLA MANDAI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. V IRSHAD VALI, S/O. LATE VAJRALA HUSSAIN SAHEB, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF KALLUR VILLAGE AND POST, PULICHERLA MANDAI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in calling the petitioner into his Police Station and detaining her and her family members hours together in connection with Registered Document bearing No.188/2023, dated 19-01-2023 executed by the petitioner in 2 favour of 5th respondent and another which is civil dispute to compromise the said civil dispute in 4th respondent police station, which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 herein not to interfere in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioner to come to the police stations to settle the civil dispute in 4th respondent police station.” 2. Sri Challa Siva Sankar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that it is a case of interference of Police in civil disputes. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on the complaint given by one Irshad Vali, Police called the Petitioner for preliminary enquiry. No crime has been registered against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the subject matter is civil in nature and the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would further submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.34911 of 2025 Dt.02.01.2026 Dinesh