- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34897 CRL.P No. 5878 of 2019 C/W CRL.P No. 5877 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5878 OF 2019 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5877 OF 2019 CRL.P.NO.5878/2019: BETWEEN: SRI N NAGIREDDY S/O N NANJAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT SLV MEDICALS KONAGANDAPALLLI KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …PETITIONER [BY SRI M D BASAVANNA, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: SRI C KUMARESHAN S/O LATE CHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF GANESH ENTERPRISES OPP. SALES TAX OFFICE OLD EXTENSION DOOM LIGHT CIRCLE KOLAR - 563 101. …RESPONDENT [BY SRI ABHILASH KUMAR M.M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.R.NANJUNDA GOWDA, ADVOCATE (PH)] Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34897 CRL.P No. 5878 of 2019 C/W CRL.P No. 5877 of 2019 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN C.C.NO.261/2019 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KOLAR REGARDING ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS DATED 23.02.2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G. CRL.P.NO.5877/2019: BETWEEN: SRI N NAGIREDDY S/O N NANJAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT SLV MEDICALS KONAGANDAPALLLI KODIHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …PETITIONER [BY SRI M D BASAVANNA, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: SRI S SREENIVASA S/O SEETHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF HAPPY JEAN'S SHOP DODDAPET, KOLAR - 563 101 KOLAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT [BY SRI UDAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE (PH)] THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN C.C.NO.1915/2018 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT KOLAR, KOLAR DISTRICT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34897 CRL.P No. 5878 of 2019 C/W CRL.P No. 5877 of 2019 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent submitted that one of main grounds urged in this petition was that petitioner along with his wife having filed insolvency case in IC no.8/2017 against 26 persons before LXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, including complainant herein even though he was a total stranger qua petitioners. It was submitted that proceedings in IC no.8/2017 had since been dismissed. Therefore, there would be no justification for continuation of above petition. 2. In order to provide opportunity, matter was adjourned. However, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner even today. This would indicate that petitioner is not diligent in pursuing petitions. Petitions are dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE YKL/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26