Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2716 (CHH)

SMT. BEENA KAUSHIK v. SIDDHANT SINGH

MAC/1440/2024 · 2026-01-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1134 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1440 of 2024 1 - Smt. Beena Kaushik W/o Late Chandrakant Kaushik Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Pand, Post Saida, P.S. And Tahsil Sakri District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Diksha Kaushik D/o Late Chandrakant Kaushik Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Beena Kaushik, R/o Village Pand, Post Saida, P.S. And Tahsil Sakri District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Bhupesh Kaushik S/o Late Chandrakant Kaushik Aged About 7 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Beena Kaushik, R/o Village Pand, Post Saida, P.S. And Tahsil Sakri District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Shivkumar S/o Late Tanuram Kaushik Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Pand, Post Saida, P.S. And Tahsil Sakri District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Laxmi Bai W/o Shiv Kumar Kaushik Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Pand, Post Saida, P.S. And Tahsil Sakri District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Appellants versus 1 - Siddhant Singh S/o Prabhu Kumar Singh Driver Of Offending Vehicle Wagnor Car Bearing Registration No. C.G.-10 F.A. 5088) R/o Quarter No. B- 122 Sai Bhumi Torwa, P.S. Torwa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Prabhu Kumar Singh S/o R.P. Singh (Owner Of Offending Vehicle Wagnor Car Bearing Registration No. C.G.-10 F.A. 5088) R/o Quarter No. B-122 Sai Bhumi Torwa, P.S. Torwa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - H.D.F.C. Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. Address- 1st Floor, Kh No. 730/2, D2 Ph No. 22, Ward No. 03, Rani Laxmi Nagar, Near Rama Magneto Mall, P.S. Civil Line District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Insurance Company) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated- 02-12-2025) 2 ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment on Board 08/01/2026 1. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellants in the second round, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim