Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:28750
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8155 of 2026
Sanjay Goswami, aged about 29 years, Son of Badhan Goswami @ Badhan Gosai, Resident of Village- Telonari, Kharkhar, P.O. & P.S.- Bengabad, District- Giridih
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, APP
---
08/24.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.07.2026 in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 76, 324(2), 351(1) and 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the Court of learned C.J.M, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is land dispute between the parties and it is alleged that the petitioner entered into the house of the informant and outraged the modesty of the lady. It is also alleged that other persons also entered into the house and assaulted the husband of the victim and other brothers.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that during investigation only the injury report of the husband has come up. He has suffered simple injury on back of scalp and pain in his leg was found. Learned counsel submits that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
5.
Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties, it appears that there is land dispute between the parties and the injury, though on vital part of the body, has been found to be simple in nature. The
2026:JHHC:28750
2
charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. However, the petitioner shall not disturb the informant or her family members in any manner whatsoever. In case of any violation of this condition, it will be open to the informant to move the learned court for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:28.09.2026