Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27149 (KAR)

MUNIRAJA REDDY v. SMT.CHINNAMMA

WP/9503/2022 · 2026-07-07

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34041 W.P. No.9503/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.9503/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MUNIRAJA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA APPAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT ADDEVISHWANATHA PURA ARAKERE POST BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVINDRANATH K, ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. CHINNAMMA W/O NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT KUNDALAHALLI BENGALURU. RAMI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA APPAIAH REDDY SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S R2 TO R5. 2. SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. VIDHYA D/O RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34041 W.P. No.9503/2022 4. SANDHYA D/O RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. 5. ROOPA D/O RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. R2 TO R5 ARE R/AT NO.99, 6th CROSS, R.K LAYOUT BOMMASANDRA POST BENGALURU 560 099. 6. MUNISWAMY REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA APPAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 7. UMESH REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA APPAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 8. NAGARAJA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA APPAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. R6 TO R8 ARE R/AT. ADDEVISHWANATHA PURA ARAKERE POST BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 9. PRAMEELAMMA W/O SREENIVAS REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT SANGEPALLI VILLAGE DANKANI KOTE TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMIL NADU. 10. RATHNAMMA W/O RAMAREDDY R/AT RAJANUKUNTE VILLAGE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34041 W.P. No.9503/2022 HESARAGHATTA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU. 11. SMT. MUNINANJAMMA W/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO. 379/3 NARAYANAMMA GARDEN KONENA AGRAHARA, HAL BENGALURU. 12. SARVAMMA W/O SHANKARALINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO. 54, 4th CROSS LAYOUT BEHIND TENT VIJAYANAGARA 2nd STAGE BENGALURU 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY R.A. ADV., FOR R1 V/O/DTD:10.05.2022, NOTICE TO R2 TO R12 ARE D/W) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN I.A.NO.1 FILED UNDER 151 OF CPC IN FDP PETITION NO.12/2018 DTD 08.04.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED U/S 151 OF CPC & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34041 W.P. No.9503/2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. The matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections. It is noticed that the matter has been pending since 2022 and the office objections are not removed. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11