07.07.2026 Court No.28 Item No.39 ssi CRM (A) 1280 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case No. 89 of 2026 dated 12.02.2026 under Sections 69/89/117(2)/351(2)/315 of the BNS 2023. And In the matter of: Nunuya Tudu …. Petitioner Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda …for the petitioner Ms. Suchismita Dutta …for the de facto Mr. Subrata Mukherjee Mr. Sanjib Das …for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. There was a relationship between the two consenting adults. After the relationship turned sour, the present FIR was lodged to falsely implicate the present petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She submits that the relationship between the two was entered into on a specific promise of marriage given by the present petitioner. The petitioner was responsible for the two earlier abortions. In the case of the 3rd pregnancy, the petitioner assaulted her severely leading to injury. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the case diary including the medical report of the victim showing the date of discharge as 08.02.2026. The diagnosis was recorded as physical assault during pregnancy. He also relies on the statements of local 2 witnesses including the landlord of the premises where the two used to stay. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)