1 CGHC010159412026 2026:CGHC:29986 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4109 of 2026 Shahnabaj Mohammad Umar Ansari S/o Mohammad Umar Ansari Aged About 31 Years R/o Andheri, Versova Link Road, Khujarali, Vashila Building Room No. 30H Thana D.N. Nagar Versova Mumbai (Maharastra) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station- Singhoda, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Ms. Anjali Pradhan, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Ritika Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 15.07.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 5/2025, registered at Police Station – Singhoda, District – Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 20(b) and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for short, the NDPS Act. 2. As per the prosecution’s case, on 16.01.2025 at about 11:40 hours, the police personnel of Police Station Singhora received secret information that certain individuals had stored illicit contraband (ganja) in a Toyota PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.07.16 15:35:37 +0530 2 Corolla car bearing registration No. MH-06/AB-3307. It was further informed that three persons were escorting/piloting the said vehicle in another car bearing registration No. OD-02/CZ-8252. Acting upon the said information, the police reached the spot and recovered 41 kilograms of ganja from the possession of the present applicant and other co-accused persons. Consequently, an offence has been registered against the applicant along with the co-accused persons, and a charge-sheet has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further contended that a co-accused, namely, Anjan Kumar Mohanty, has already been granted bail by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 19.01.2026 passed in SLP (Crl.) No. 18677/2025. It is further submitted that another co-accused, namely, Ataulla Khan, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 13.04.2026 passed in MCRC No. 1576/2026, and the second bail application of another co-accused, namely, Husain Iqbal Shaikh, has also been allowed by this Court vide order dated 13.04.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2907/2026. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed, the applicant has no criminal antecedents, and he has been in judicial custody since 16.01.2025. Considering the period of incarceration, the fact that the trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude, and the parity with the co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail, it is prayed that the applicant be granted regular bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case but could not dispute the fact that the co-accused persons 3 have been granted bail by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and by this Court. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. After hearing the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties as well as considering the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and there is no previous criminal antecedents, further, a co-accused, namely, Anjan Kumar Mohanty, has already been granted bail by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 19.01.2026 passed in SLP (Crl.) No. 18677/2025, further another co-accused, namely, Ataulla Khan, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 13.04.2026 passed in MCRC No. 1576/2026, and the second bail application of another co-accused, namely, Husain Iqbal Shaikh, has also been allowed by this Court vide order dated 13.04.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2907/2026 and he has been in judicial custody since 16.01.2025. and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take sometime, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let applicant - Shahnabaj Mohammad Umar Ansari, involved in Crime No. 5/2025, registered at Police Station – Singhoda, District – Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 20(b) and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for short, the NDPS Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in 4 court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti