IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWP-20363-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 RAM CHANDER ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 and 7. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer to deciding the representation dated 12.01.2026, Annexure P-6 and states that a similarly circumstanced employee namely Chand Kumar Sangwan, vide order dated 21.12.2010 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench in CWP No.22839-2010 titled as Chand Kumar Sangwan and Others Versus UHBVNL and Another, has been directed to approach the concerned Authorities for his representation to be decided. 2. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 4. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to look into the representation dated 12.01.2026, Annexure P-6, expeditiously, in accordance with law. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 08, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.08 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order