[2026:JHHC:28674] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8884 of 2026 ------ Bishram Oraon, aged about 40 years, Son of Karma Oraon, Resident of Raghunathpur, House No. 60/A, P.O. – Raghunathpur, P.S. – Chanho, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated:-23-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 281, 125(b), 125(a), 109, 132 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the police personnel by running Mahindra Thar vehicle with a defaced number plate and blacken glass of the said vehicle, over them resulting in injuries being sustained by the police personnel. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is also involved in four other cases as has been mentioned in para-17 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.07.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that charge sheet has not yet been submitted in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that keeping in view the audacity of the petitioner of attempting to murder the police personnel by running a Thar vehicle over them and the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the chance of his absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail, as also his criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to admit the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above named petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 23.09.2026 Saroj/