Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2714 (RAJ)

SHEKH NAJIBUR RAHMAN S/O SHEKA ZENUL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10320/2025 · 2026-04-22

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16970] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10320/2025 Shekh Najibur Rahman S/o Sheka Zenul, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Kagji Devra Chhittoudo Ke Nohre Ki Gali Bundi Police Thana Kotwali District Bundi Rajasthan. ----AccusedPetitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhil Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 22/04/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 204/2024 registered at Police Station Lakheri, District Bundi for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 331(4) & 305(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that recovery has already been effected from main accused Mohammad Hussain. He further submits that main accused Mohammad Hussain has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not required for further investigation; no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner; that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by accused-petitioner hereinabove. [2026:RJ-JP:16970] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10320/2025] 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that main accused Mohammad Hussain has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself and no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of Shekh Najibur Rahman S/o Sheka Zenul, he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station in FIR No. 204/2024 on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and; (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/44