RAJARAJESHWARI v. The Director of Town and Country Planning
WP/20610/2026 · 2026-05-27
G R Swaminathan, V Lakshminarayanan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27128 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27128 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Nos.20610 & 20614 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP Nos.20610 & 20614 of 2026 and W.M.P. No.22162 of 2026 Rajarajeshwari ..Petitioner in both W.Ps Vs
1. The Director of Town and Country Planning, Office of the Director of Town and Country Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore. 3. Assistant Commissioner (East) Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore. 4. Rajasekaran The Town Planning Officer, Coimbatore. ..Respondents in both W.Ps Prayer in W.P.No.20610 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the show cause notice issued by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.2435/2025/H2(Ki) dated 12.05.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry and decide the grievance of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Nos.20610 & 20614 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer in W.P.No.20610 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to adduce evidence during the course of enquiry by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 21.05.2026. For Petitioner: Mr.Karan (in both W.Ps) For Respondents: Mr.M.Guruprasad Counsel for Govt. of Tamil Nadu for R1 (in both W.Ps) Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar Standing Counsel for R2 & R3 (in both W.Ps) COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Since the writ petitioner was called upon to appear before the Town Planning Authority against whom she has made allegations, these writ petitions came to be filed. 2. When the matters were taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for Coimbatore Municipal Corporation submits that a revised enquiry notice is going to be issued and that the petitioner will have to appear before the Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation on
01.06.2026. The petitioner through her counsel gives an undertaking that she will honour the said summon. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Nos.20610 & 20614 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
3. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.) 27-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi/kak To
1.
The Director of Town and Country Planning, Office of the Director of Town and Country Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600002. 2. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore. 3. The Assistant Commissioner (East) Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Nos.20610 & 20614 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. mmi/kak WP Nos.20610 & 20614 of 2026 27-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis