Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010671872025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT PETITION NO: 34828/2025 Between:
1. SRI ANR COTTON TRADERS, REP BY ITS PARTNER ALAPATI GOPAL KRISHNA W/O LATE NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. 2-1- GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR D.T
1. M/S UCO BANK, Rep by its authorized officer, Guntur mid Corporate Branch (0223), 9/1, Arundalpeta, Ph.No.9230500223, Email guntur@ucobank.co.in
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more par WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent Bank in issu an E-Auction Sale Notice dated 06 30-days pre-sale notice as required under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The said action of the respondent is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the mandatory SARFAESI Act, and contrary to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the petitioner prays that this Hon E-Auction Sale Notice dated 06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 34828/2025 SRI ANR COTTON TRADERS, REP BY ITS PARTNER ALAPATI GOPAL KRISHNA W/O LATE NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 -64, NEAR RAMALAYAM STAMBALAGARUVU, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR D.T-522006. ...PETITIONER AND M/S UCO BANK, Rep by its authorized officer, Guntur mid Corporate Branch (0223), 9/1, Arundalpeta, Guntur A.P.52002, Ph.No.9230500223, Email guntur@ucobank.co.in ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent Bank in issu Auction Sale Notice dated 06-12-2025, without issuing the mandatory sale notice as required under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The said action of the respondent is wholly illegal, f the mandatory procedure prescribed under the SARFAESI Act, and contrary to the principles of natural justice.
Therefore, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to suspend the impugned Auction Sale Notice dated 06-12-2025 and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3558] EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA SRI ANR COTTON TRADERS, REP BY ITS PARTNER ALAPATI GOPAL KRISHNA W/O LATE NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 64, NEAR RAMALAYAM STAMBALAGARUVU, ...PETITIONER M/S UCO BANK, Rep by its authorized officer, Guntur mid Corporate Guntur A.P.52002, ...RESPONDENT India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ticularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent Bank in issuing 2025, without issuing the mandatory sale notice as required under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The said action of the respondent is wholly illegal, procedure prescribed under the SARFAESI Act, and contrary to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the ble Court be pleased to suspend the impugned
2 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.34828 of 2025
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 06-12-2025 pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PONNEKANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. RAMA KRISHNA A
3 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.34828 of 2025
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 08.01.2026 MDP