1 CGHC010254962026 2026:CGHC:30517 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 875 of 2026 1 - Pramod Kumar Bhagat S/o. Late Bhagat Ram, Aged About 35 Years Caste Uraon, R/o. Ward No. 17, Indira Gandhi Ward, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.)........... Applicant / Plaintiff ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Kailash Paikra S/o Shri Birturam, Aged About 33 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Ward No. 06, Baigapara, Village Thakurpur, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 01 / Defendant No. 01 2 - Rakesh Paikra, S/o Shri Birturam, Aged About 29 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Ward No. 05, Imlipara, Village Thakurpur, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 02 / Defendant No. 02 3 - Sivanti, D/o. Birturam, W/o. Shri Lachhan Paikra, Aged About 28 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Nawapara, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 03 / Defendant No. 03 4 - Jeevanti, D/o. Birturam, W/o. Ramlal, Aged About 29 Years Caste Kanwer, R/o. Udari, Police Station And Tahsil Lundra, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 04 / Defendant No. 04 5 - Dhanmet, D/o. Birturam, W/o. Bude Paikra, Aged About 31 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Thakurpur, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 05 / Defendant No. 05 ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.07.17 18:07:11 +0530 2 6 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Sarguja, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 06 / Defendant No. 06 ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocate. For State : Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 17/07/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the present writ petition has been filed against the non- filing of the written statement, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the written statement has been filed before the learned trial Court, and he does not want to press the present writ petition. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok