Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HN, J
W.P.No.1992_2014 APHC010669492014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1992/2014 Between:
1. VARANASI GANGA SWAROOP,, S/O V.V.S.G.PRASAD, AGED 22OYEARS, R/O JONNAVADA VILLAGE, BUCHIREDDIPALEM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
2. N.SURESH BABU,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O D.NO.26-1-1786, KONDAYAPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD.
3. SRI MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY KAMAKSHI THAI TEMPLE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JONNAVADA VILLAGE, BUCHIREDDIPALEM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Employment Notification dated 07.06.2013 issued by the 3rd respondent in respect of post of "Archaka" is illegal and ultra
2
HN, J
W.P.No.1992_2014 vires to the provisions of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India besides being in violation of the provisions of the A.P.Act 30/1987 and the Rules framed thereunder on the subject and consequently direct the respondent No.3 not to proceed further and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2412 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Employment Notification dated 07.06.2013 issued by the 3rd respondent in respect of the post of "Archaka" pending final disposal of the Writ Petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SHYAMALA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION)
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
3
HN, J
W.P.No.1992_2014 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1992 of 2014
ORDER:
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today.
2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the Endowments Department submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for any
consideration, as the respondents have conceded in their counter that the fixation of age was erroneously printed. It is further submitted that, during the course of time, one S. Giridhar Sarma, who was holding the post of Paricharika, has been promoted to the post of Archaka in the year 2023, and that there are no vacant posts at present. It is also submitted that the petitioner No.1 has been accommodated as Paricharika on an outsourcing basis, considering his disability.
3. Recording the same, the present writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:27.01.2026 NKA
4
HN, J
W.P.No.1992_2014 108 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 1992 of 2014 Date: 27.01.2026
NKA