APHC010673222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 34701/2025 Between: 1. MANDALA SAMRAJYAM, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O KANCHIKACHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KANCHIKACHERLA SUB-DIVISION, NANDIGAMA. 4. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KANCHIKACHERLA POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT. 5. 5. BANDLAMUDI NAGESWARARAO, S/O SAMBASIVARAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 02, NALLURU ENCLAVE, GUNTUPALLI VILLAGE, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.34701 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner: VELADI SAI SRI HARSHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 4 in threatening the petitioner to deliver the possession of the petitioner land to 5THRespondent and not to carry any agricultural operations in the petitioner land by interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 5 even though there is a civil decree in favor of the petitioner vide O.S. No. 142 of 2020 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No. 5 not to threaten the petitioner and not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the Respondents No.5 without following due process of law in the interest of justice….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri. Veladi Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent No.4 is interfering in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the petitioner has filed O.S.No.142 of 2020 before 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.34701 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 the learned Principal Civil Judge(Junior Division), Nandigama, and the same was decreed in favour of the petitioner. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.4 not to interfere with the civil dispute henceforth pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 at the behest of respondent No.5. However, if any crime is registered against the petitioner, the police are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 24.02.2026 PBS 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.34701 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 236 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 34701 of 2025 Date: 24.02.2026 PBS