IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10929 of 2026 ====================================================== Ramesh Yadav Son of Ramrprit Yadav, Resident of Village Siswa Barhi, PS and Circle Phulparas, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Darbhanga. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Phulparas, District Madhubani. 5. The Circle Officer, Phulparas Circle, District Madhubani. 6. The Anchal Amin Phulparas Circle, District Madhubani. 7. Ajit Kumar Yadav, S/o shri Shivnath Yadav, Resident of Village Siswa Barhi, PS and Circle Phulparas, District Madhubani. 8. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (18) : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, AC to GP 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to implead the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani as respondent no. 8 in course of the day. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondent for removal of encroachment from done by the Respondent no. 7 for the excess land appertaining to Patna High Court CWJC No.10929 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/3 khata no. 365 khehra old 2133 kheshra new 2729 under mauja Siswa Barhi Thana No 106 P.S. and Circle-Phulparas District- Madhubani as he has acquired only 5 Katha 8 dhur through a registered sale deed on 29.7.1991 from the said plot while he has illegally took possession over 10 katha 12 dhur and 8 kanma and thus he has encroached more 5 katha 4 dhur 8 kanma of land which belongs to S.H. 51 and Hind Keshar. (ii) for direction upon the respondents to take immediate step towards removal of encroachment. (iii) for any other relief(s) order(s) to which the petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a proper petition shall be filed before the respondent no. 8, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani in next four weeks. 5. Learned State counsel submits that if such petition is preferred, it will be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest in accordance with law. 6. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 8, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani who shall be Patna High Court CWJC No.10929 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 3/3 noticing the stakeholders including the respondent no. 7 and see to it that within the time frame stipulated under the act, the petition preferred by the petitioner shall be concluded. sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U