Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27116 (CAL)

SK. NASIR KHAN @ SK. NASHIR KHAN @ NATA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/2719/2025 · 2026-07-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 400. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 2719 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Budge Budge Police Station Case No. 338 of 2023 dated 15.10.2023 under section 376AB of the Indian Penal Code and under section 6 of the POCSO Act. And In the matter of : Sk. Nasir Khan @ Sk. Nashir Khan @ Nata ……Petitioner. Mr. Soumya Nag Mr. karan Prasad ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, APP ……for the State. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for 2 years and 7 months and till date only one witness has been examined out of the 10 witnesses cited by the prosecution. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the statement of the victim as well as the mother under Section 183 of the BNSS. 2 Having considered the same as well as the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Sk. Nasir Khan @ Sk. Nashir Khan @ Nata shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judge (POCSO), 2nd Court, Alipore, 24 Parganas South. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of 24 Parganas South without the prior permission of the learned Special Court. Thus, CRM (M) 2719 of 2025 is allowed. Memo of Evidence and the report submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)