[2026:JHHC:28591] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8847 of 2026 ------ Indradeo Yadav, aged about 45 years, Son of Bisun Yadav Resident of Village Behradih, P.O.- Sharmatand & P.S. Jainagar, District Koderma .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mritunjay Chaudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha, Advocate Ms. Kumari Priyambada, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated-23-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.239 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 190, 191 (2), 303(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the informant- Girdhari Sao by assaulting on his right shoulder with a Danda resulting in undisplaced fracture of the right infraspinous scapula body associated oedematous soft tissue change. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is further submitted that the assault was not made on any vital part of the body of the victim and the alleged occurrence took place at the spur of the moment. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Koderma in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.239 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-23.09.2026-Animesh/