Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34436 W.P. No.23265/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.23265/2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAMAIAH REDDY S/O SIDDA REDDY SINCE DEAD REP. BY HIS LR’S.
SUBBAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS. 2. N.R. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O RAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. N.R. JAMUNA W/O K.C. SUBHAKAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.101 POST OFFICE ROAD DODDANEKKUNDI VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA K, ADV., [ABSENT])
AND:
1. KRISHNA REDDY S/O SIDDA REDDY
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34436 W.P. No.23265/2021
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. 2. SMT. VASANTHA W/O KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT NEAR RAMA TEMPLE DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE. 3. BHOOWANA CHANDRA JOSHI S/O HAMSHA DUTT JOSHI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT NO.20-37, 17TH MAIN 1ST CROSS, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE. 4. B.B. KULKARNI S/O B.A. KULKARNI AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT NO.1086, 27TH CROSS JAYANAGARA 9TH BLOCK BANGALORE-560069. 5. N. SUKANYA D/O N. NARAYANA SHASTRI AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT NO.241, 9TH MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK BANGALORE-560011. 6. M.G. CHERIAN S/O CHERIAN GEORGE AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT ASSISINAGAR CO-OP-HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., B/NO-4/8, 3RD FLOOR, CHAMBER P.L.
LOKHAND MARY, BOMBAY-43. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34436 W.P. No.23265/2021
7. N. SUNITHA D/O NARAYANA SHASTRI AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT NO.241, 9TH MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK BANGALORE-560011. 8. THERASAMMA ANTHONY W/O ANTHONY AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT P.A. 224, HAL COLONY YEMALUR POST BANGALORE. 9. K. BHANU PRIYA W/O A. GUNALAN AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT NO.653, DOOMAL NILAYAM VIBHUTHIPURA VILLAGE MARTHAHALLI, BANGALORE. 10. NAGESH REDDY S/O RAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/A KEMPAPURA VILLAGE YEMALUR POST BANGALORE-560037. 11. JAYAMMA W/O RAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT TATNOOR VILLAGE ANUGONDAHANAHALLI HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 12. SMT. PAPAMMA W/O LAKSHMAIAH REDDY D/O SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT BELLANDUR VILLAGE
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34436 W.P. No.23265/2021
BELLANDUR POST BANGALORE. 13. SHAKUNTHALA D/O SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NEAR RAMA TEMPLE DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE. 14. NAGARATHNA W/O VIJAYARAGAVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT NO.31, 3RD CROSS AVINI SRINGERI BAGAR BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560076. 15.
SARASWATHI W/O BALAKRISHNAIAH REDDY D/O SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A SRINIVAS REDDY LAYOUT GAREBHAVU PALYA HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE. 16. INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION NO.180, MARATHAHALLI NEAR BMA COLLEGE OUTER RING ROAD DODDANEKKUNDI VILLAGE BANGALORE. 17. UNITED DAFFODILS NO.180, MARATHAHALLI NEAR BMA COLLEGE OUTER RING ROAD DODDANEKKUNDI VILLAGE BANGALORE. - 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34436 W.P. No.23265/2021
18. SMT. K. SHALINI D/O N.S. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 19. PRAVALLIKA D/O N.S. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. BOTH R18 & R19 ARE R/AT DODDANEKKUNDI VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE.560048. …RESPONDENTS
(V/O/DTD:13.01.2022, NOTICE TO R3 TO R7 IS D/W V/O/DTD:08.02.2022, NOTICE TO R8 TO R19 IS D/W R1 & R2 SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COURT OF HON’BLE LXV ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-66) IN O.S.NO.9152/2014 ON IA NO.IX UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 OF CPC VIDE ANEXURE-E AND ALLOW THE PETITONER TO AMEND THE PLAINT & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34436 W.P. No.23265/2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Even on 24.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31