Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27106 (CAL)

MD. ASHIF FIROZ v. ZOYA ASHIF FIROZ @ JOYA ASHIF FIROZ @ ANKITA ROY SARASWATI

CO/795/2026 · 2026-07-02

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L- 667 02/07/2026 Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 795 of 2026 Md. Ashif Firoz Vs. Zoya Ashif Firoz @ Joya Ashif Firoz @ Ankita Roy Saraswati Mr. Rajib Ghosh Ms. Gargi Mukherjee ….for the petitioner The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act in Misc. Case (Act VIII) No.213 of 2024 has been heard and the matter was reserved for passing order but till date the order has not been passed. It appears from the order sheets appended to this application that the Presiding Officer has been transferred and the Court of the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Barasat is lying vacant. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite parties. However, the learned advocate for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite parties or the learned advocate representing the opposite parties before the learned trial judge. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioners, CO 795 of 2026 stands disposed of by observing that after the regular Presiding Officer joins, an endeavour shall be made by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Barasat to dispose 2 of the application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. There will be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)