Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27103 (JHR)

DEBASHISH ROY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(SJ)/386/2026 · 2026-09-23

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:28574 23.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 24.09.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 386 of 2026 ------ Debashish Roy, age about- 54 yrs, S/o- Late Gautam Roy, R/o Roy Kuthi, Line Tank Road, Chadri Ward No. 22, Old Ward No. 18, Chadri, P.S.- Kotwali, P.O:- G.P.O. District- Ranchi- 834001, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Appellant(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bablu Munda, S/o Late Karu Munda, aged about 40 years, R/o village:- Chadri, Line Tank Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 834001. .... .... .... Respondent(s) With Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 183 of 2026 ------ Rajib Roy, age about 62 yrs, S/o Birendra Nath Roy, R/o Roy Kuthi, Line Tank Road, Chadri Ward No. 22, Old Ward No. 18, Chadri, P.S.- Kotwali, P.O:- G.P.O. District- Ranchi- 834001, Jharkhand .... .... …. Appellant(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bablu Munda, S/o Late Karu Munda, aged about 40 years, R/o village:- Chadri, Line Tank Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 834001 .... .... .... Respondent(s) ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Tanya Rai, Adv. For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Master Akash, Adv. ------ Order No.06/Dated : 23.09.2026 1. In pursuant to the order dated 08.09.2026, Mr. Animanand Roshan Toppo, S.I.-cum-Officer In-charge, SC/ST P.S.-Ranchi, is physically present before this Court. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the trial Court. Now, there is no apprehension of arrest. 3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellants seek permission to withdraw these appeals with a liberty to work-out their remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents have raised no objection. 5. Accordingly, both these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 6. The personal appearance of aforesaid official is hereby dispensed with. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)