K Lakshmi Narayana Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/34867/2025 · 2026-01-05
V Sujatha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27102 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27102 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010674172025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 34867/2025 Between:
1. K LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O CHALAMA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR FLAT. NO. 403, VENKATADHRI APARTMENT, YERRAMUKKAPALLI, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT(WRD),
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SSLC AND SB CIRCLE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, T.G.P DIVISION, VENKATGIRI. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2
VS,J
W.P.NO.34867 OF 2025
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction or order particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein, in withholding the payment of pt and part bill Amount of Rs.32,40,091 /- , under the SAP.No.2025-1989150 even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e., Construction of Offices Building for TOP 7th Branch Canal Sub Division No's. 1,2,3 at Naidupeta, under TCP Division, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District, vide Agreement No. 3SE/2023-2024, Dt.9.10.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal and arbitrary apart from violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 86 300-A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of 1st 85 part bill Net Amount of Rs.32,40,091/-, under the SAP.No.2025-1989150 with an interest @24percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work., forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased DIRECT the respondents to consider for payment of 1st and part bill Amount of Rs.32,40,091/-, under the SAP.No.2025-1989150 with regard to the completion of work i.e.; “Construction of Offices Building for TGP 7th Branch Canal Sub Division No’s. 1,2,3 at Naidupeta, under TGP Division, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District”, vide Agreement No.: 3SE/2023-2024, Dt.
9.10.2023” with an interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
3
VS,J
W.P.NO.34867 OF 2025 The Court made the following ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“….to issue a writ or direction or order particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein, in withholding the payment of pt and part bill Amount of Rs.32,40,091 /- , under the SAP.No.2025- 1989150 even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e., Construction of Offices Building for TOP 7th Branch Canal Sub Division No's. 1,2,3 at Naidupeta, under TCP Division, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District, vide Agreement No. 3SE/2023-2024, Dt.9.10.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal and arbitrary apart from violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 86 300-A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of 1st 85 part bill Net Amount of Rs.32,40,091/-, under the SAP.No.2025-1989150 with an interest @24percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work., forthwith, and pass.”
2. The petitioner had been awarded the contract of work(s) by the Irrigation Department. After execution of the said contract, the respondents also issued quality control certificate to a tune of Rs.30,58,099/-, As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition. 3. It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sum of money, no payment is being made. The
4
VS,J
W.P.NO.34867 OF 2025 petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court. 4. This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest. 5.
On the other hand, learned Government Pleader placed oral instructions stated that since the budget was not released by the Government, the bills were not paid to the petitioner. Soon after release of the budget by the Government, the bills will be paid to the petitioner, however, admitted the amount payable to the petitioner as per the quality control certificate filed by the petitioner to a tune of Rs.30,58,099/-. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances submitted in the affidavit, and the directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificate dated 22.02.2024 issued by the
5
VS,J
W.P.NO.34867 OF 2025 respondents within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 7. As far as interest component is concerned, if there is any subsisting clause in the agreement/work order envisaging payment of interest upon any amount which is due and payable, the same is binding upon both the parties. 8. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date :06.01.2026 LSP