Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27101 (PNJ)

NIRMAL SINGH @ NIMMI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/26610/2026 · 2026-07-08

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26610-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Nirmal Singh @ Nimmi and others …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Ankit Joshi, Advocate,for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to them in case DDR No.50 dated 14.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Cantt. Bathinda, District Bathinda, which is cross-version of FIR No.30 dated 07.03.2026 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 109, 118(1), 115(2), 191(2), 190, 351(2), 55 of BNS at Police Station Cantt. Bathinda, District Bathinda. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of the order dated 20.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 20.05.2026 passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioners shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.07.08 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document