Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 271 (JHR)

BIMAL BASKI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1564/2026 · 2026-03-16

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7162 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1564 of 2026 ------ Bimal Baski .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Victim .... .... .... Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate ------ Order No.02 / Dated : 16.03.2026 Heard Mr. Rajeev Sharma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel appearing for the informant, Mr. Zaid Ahmed. The petitioner is an accused in connection with S.T. No.156 of 2025 arising out of Pakur (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 10 of 2022. It has been alleged that the petitioner had established physical relationship with the informant on the pretext of marriage. When the informant became pregnant, she was administered medicine, which terminated the fetus. A Panchayti was convened and the petitioner refused to solemnize marriage with the informant. Submission has been advanced by the learned senior counsel on behalf of the petitioner that the informant has solemnized marriage with another person on 04.09.2011. In support of it, a certificate has been relied upon. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.01.2026. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has doubted the veracity of the certificate which has been brought on record by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner. It appears from the nature of allegation levelled in the First Information Report that the victim was a consenting party to the sexual overtures of the petitioner. Considering the said fact, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with S.T. No.156 of 2025 arising out of Pakur (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 10 of 2022. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Anit Uploaded 18.03.2026