APHC010123722026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Tuesday, the Seventh day of April, Two Thousand and Twenty Six present The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Revision Petition No.880 of 2026 Between: 1.S.Vyshnavi, Wo.S.Viswanath, aged about 54 years, house wife, residing at D.No.1-67, Pampanur village, Atmakur Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. ...Petitioner and 1.E.Thirupaiu, S/o.E.Malarayudu, aged about 24 years, private employee, residing at Pampanur village, Atmakur Mandal Ananthapuramu District. 2.E.Sanjamma, W/o. E.Malarayudu, aged about 56 years, house wife, residing at Pampanur village, Atmakur Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: 1.P.Sravan Kumar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: Nil 2 BSB,J C.R.P.No.880 of 2026 The Court made the following order: This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by non-disposal of the interlocutory application in I.A.No.178 of 2025 in O.S.No.535 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. seeking temporary injunction against the respondents Nos.1 and 2 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner / plaintiff. The counter to the interlocutory application was also filed. However, since then till now, the petition has not been disposed of on merits. The trial Court issued urgent notice to the respondents / defendants on 15.04.2025 and adjourned the case to 30.04.2025. The suit, along with I.A.No.178 of 2025, was filed on 15.04.2025 and the written statement itself bears the date 08.07.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the photographs filed along with the revision petition clearly show that the construction of the house of the petitioner is half way through and that inspite of the best case of the plaintiff, it is not possible to present the case before the Court to secure the necessary relief claimed in I.A.No.178 of 2025 as enquiry has not been taken up and therefore, it is just and necessary to direct the trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the petition. 3. Perused the record. Since the above stated circumstances, it is necessary to give suitable directions to the trial Court for expeditious hearing and disposal of the petition. 4. As such, the revision petition is allowed directing the trial Court to hear I.A.No.178 of 2025 on merits and pass appropriate order as per law as early as possible not later than three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 3 BSB,J C.R.P.No.880 of 2026 There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this civil revision petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 07.04.2026 GRL Note: CC by 10.04.2026 4 BSB,J C.R.P.No.880 of 2026 09 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi C.R.P. No.880 of 2026 Dated 07.04.2026 GRL Note: CC by 10.04.2026