ARGHYO MULLICK @ ARGHYA MALLIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/2787/2025 · 2026-07-08
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27092 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27092 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L13 08.07.2026 Bpg. Allowed
C.R.M. (M) 2787 of 2025
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Ranaghat Police District Cyber Crime Police Station Case No.34 of 2025 dated 16th March, 2025 under Sections 318(2)/319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/61(2) with added sections 111(2)(B)/111(3)(4)(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023;
Arghyo Mullick @ Arghya Mallik Versus State of West Bengal
Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly situated as the other accused, namely, Arabinda Biswas @ Kalu who has already been granted bail in CRM(M)546 of 2026.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to refute the contention that the petitioner is not similarly situated as the other accused who has been released on bail.
In view of the aforesaid, the present petitioner, namely, Arghyo Mullick @ Arghya Mallik be released on bail on same terms and conditions by the learned trial court as was imposed upon Arabinda Biswas @ Kalu in CRM(M)546 of 2026.
2
Thus, CRM(M) 2787 of 2025 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)