[2026:JHHC:28435] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8398 of 2026 ------ Abhishek Sinha, aged about 27 years, S/o Anand Nath Ray, R/o Village Chanpi, P.O. Ghunsuli, P.S. Karra, District – Khunti (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-21-09-2026 I.A. No. 13204 of 2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to amend the instant Bail Application to the effect that the petitioner is the son of Anand Nath Ray and not is the daughter; as has wrongly been mentioned in the Bail Application. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this interlocutory application be allowed. Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer to carry out the amendment as proposed in this interlocutory application is allowed. The petitioner is directed to file a consolidated Bail Application by incorporating the amendment as proposed in this interlocutory application allowed today. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the consolidated Bail Application. Keep the same in the record. This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.8398 of 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, has committed abduction of the father of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner by drawing attention of this Court to the order dated 29.07.2026 passed in B.A. No. 5965 of 2026, that the co-accused Samir Tirkey @ Sameer Sanjiv Tirkey has amicably resolved his dispute with the informant. It is also submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR yet without putting him under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-8 of the Bail Application, charge sheet has been submitted against him but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.05.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent save and except one case being S.T. Case No. 115 of 2026 arising out of Nagari P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024 wherein, he is on bail as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 29.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.5965 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Khunti in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-21.09.2026 Saroj/