SMT BHANUMATHI SHAMANNA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
MFA/3738/2021 · 2026-07-07
Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27082 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27082 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34043-DB MFA No. 3738 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3738 OF 2021 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. BHANUMATHI SHAMANNA DAUGHTER OF LATE LAKSHMANAMURTHY WIFE OF SRI SHAMANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.12, DEJA VIEW PARK LAYOUT, OPPOSITE TO DEFENCE COLONY HOODI, MAHADEVAPURA POST BANGALORE-560048 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. P.H.VIRUPAKSHAIAH, ADV.) AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (METRO) NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001
2.
THE CHIEF MANAGER (LAND AND ESTATE) BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. (B.M.R.C.L.)
Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34043-DB MFA No. 3738 of 2021
SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027
3.
SRI L NARAYANA REDDY SON OF LATE LAKSHMANAMURTHY AGED ABOUT YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.101, 102 VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560103
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P. V., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADV. FOR R2;
V.C.O. DTD:7.6.2024 NOTICE TO R3 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 54 RULE 1 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND ACQUITION ACT, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.04.2018 PASSED IN LAC NO.16/2017.
ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34043-DB MFA No. 3738 of 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo to that effect.
2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Applicable Court fee shall be refunded to the appellant on proper identification and in accordance with law.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29