Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27080 (KAR)

HANUMANTHAPPA T. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/653/2022 · 2026-07-06

M Nagaprasanna

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA REVIEW PETITION NO. 653 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. HANUMANTHAPPA T. S/O THIPPAIAH T. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WORKING AS PRINCIPAL MDRS DEVARAKOTTA YALLADAKERE, HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA - 577 546. 2. SANJEEVKUMAR S/O HANUMANTH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS A PRINCIPAL MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL HULSOOR SC 333 HULSOOR TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT. 3. MAMMADEVI D/O BHAKTAVASTALASALOKE AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS A PRINCIPAL KRCRS BHALKI TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT-585 328. 4. PATHALINGAPPA P S/O PATHAPPA M Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS WORKING AS A PRINCIPAL CHALLEKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 5. BADRI NARAYAN HP S/O PRIYA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS WORKING AS PRINCIPAL MDRS VATAGARATHIRTALLI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 432. 6. SHIVAKUMAR K.B. S/O BASAVARAJAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS SOCIAL SCIENCE TEACHER MDRS, SC BEGARUMARDI SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 7. KALLESH K.G S/O K.G SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS P.E. TEACHER MDRS SC-32MKOGUNDE CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 8. KANTEPPA S/O SIDDRAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS A PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER MDRS SC HULSOOR BIDUR DISTRICT. 9. SANDYA AGERA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 D/O BAPTIST AGERA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MDRS ANANDGERI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 10. SHARADAMMMA N D/O NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS A KANNADA TEACHER MDRS VATAGARU, THEERTHAHALLI TQ SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 11. MUTHURAJU S/O NANJASHETTY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS MATHEMATICS TEACHER MDRS, THANGALAGERE MANDYA DISTRICT. 12. HANUMANTHA KUMAR B C S/O CHIKKAHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS WORKING AS SOCIAL ASSISTANT TEACHER MDRS SC MAYAGANAHALLI RAMANAGARA. 13. KARIBASAVE GOWDA .B S/O BASAVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS SOCIEAL SCIENCE TEACHER, MDRS HOSAKOTE KANKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 14. MYLARAPPA C S/O CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS KANNADA TEACHER MDRS HOSAKOTE KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA. 15. KAMALAMMA M S/O MANCHEGOWDA M AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MDRS KEMPEGOWDA CIRCLE RAMANAGARA 16. CHETHANKUMAR B S S/O SIDDARAJU BS AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS SCIENCE ASSISTANT TEACHER, MDRS ANUMANAHALLI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 17. HEMANTHKUMAR K V S/O VENKATESMURTHY AGED ABOTU 44 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI ASSISTANT TEACHER MDRS HOSAKOTE KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA. 18. SHIVANNA D.B S/O BORANNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER MDRS - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 HONNALAGERE, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. 19. JNANEDRA NAIKA K S/O KUMARA NAIK AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS WORKING AS ASSISTANT PE TEACHER MDRS KEMPEGOWDA CIRCLE, RAMANAGARA TOWN RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 159. 20. GEETHANJALI M. D/O. MALAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS WORKING AS A MATHEMATICS TEACHER MDRS KEMPEGOWDA CIRCLE RAMANAGARA. 21. THIMMEGOWDA G S/O GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MDRS MAYAGANAHALLI KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA. 22. NIVEDITHA N.G D/O GAVITHIMMAYA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MDRS, DODDABADAGORE KURIKALU DODDI, MARALAVADI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA. 23. NALINI M - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 D/O BASAVARADYA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS WORKING AS AN HINDI TEAHCER ANUR VILLAGE, 7200 BEHIND GOVT SCHOOL ANNURKERI PSOT, GUNDLUPETE TALUK CHAMARAJNAGAR DIST. 24. JAYASHREE S W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS WORKING AS AN HINDI TEACHER KITTUR RANI CHENNAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL RANGASANDRA CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 127. 25. ROOPASHREE G.B. S/O MAHENDRA C H AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS WORKING AS AN MATHS TEACHER KRCR, RANGANSANDRA CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK /DIST. 26. SHANTHA KUMARI C D/O CHINTHAMANI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS WORKING AS SOCIAL SCINCE TEACHER MDR SCHOOL, MELUKAMANAHALLI, GUNDLUPETE TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. 27. REKHA W/O NAGASUNDARA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 WORKING AS SOCIAL SCIENCE TEAHCER, KRCRS RANGASANDRA CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DIST. 28. SOWMYA W/O NAGANNA S AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS WORKING AS ENGLISH TEACHER MDRS MALLAIAHPURA CHAMARAJA NAGAR TALUK AND DIST. 29. SATHYANARAYAN K S/O LATE KRISHNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS WORKING AS SOCIAL SCIENCE TEACHER, MDRS SCHOOL BC HANUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST - 571 444. 30. NANDINI B D/O B.P. BASAVANNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS WORKING AS KANNADA TEACHER KITTUR RANI CHENAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL THIMMARAJIPURA, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJNAGAR DIST - 571 444. 31. SEEMA P W/O SANDEEP C AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS SCIENCE TEAHCER KITTUR RANI CHENNAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL THIMMARAJIPURA - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJNAGAR DIST. - 571 440. 32. SHIVA PRASAD C V S/O VIJAY KUMAR C S AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS WORKING AS SCINECE TEACHER, MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL UMMATTURE, CHAMARAJNAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 571 316. 33. RAMESHA J S/O JOGAPPA AGE ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS PE TEACHER MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL BC, HANUR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. 34. S. MAHALAKSHMI W/O T.C. NAGESH WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER KITTUR RANI CHENNAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, THIMMARAJIPURA, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJNAGAR DIST. - 571 440. 35. NIRMALA D/O K. NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MDRS MELUMANAHALLI GUNDLUPET TALUK - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. 36. GURUMURTHY S S/O SUNDARAIAH S AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS SCIENCE TEACHER MDRS, HOOGYAM HANUR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 444. 37. KRISHNAMURTHY K S/O KEMPAIAH (LATE), AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS KANNADA TEACHER, MORAJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SHOOL HANUR, RS DODDI HANUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 38. UMESHA S/O KAMANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS WORKING AS SCIENCE TEACHER, MDRS SC, YELANDURE TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 442. 39. SUJATHA D W/O JAICHANDRA SINGH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL SC, MULLAHALLIGETE ,YELLANDURE TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 40. R. RAJASHEKARA S/O RAJASHEKARA - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS WORKING AS PE TEACHER MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL SC, MULLAHALLIGETE, YELANDURE TALUK CHAMRAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 41. PUTTASWAMY N S/O NANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS SCIENCE TEACHER MDRS MELUKAMANAHALLI, GUNDLUPET TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 42. KUSUMA K C W/O GIRISH P WORKING AS ENGILSH TEACHER AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, MDRS SC, HANUR, KOLLEGALA TALUK CHAMRAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 43. PAVITHRA V D/O VENKATESH B K AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS WORKING AS KANNADA TEACHER, MDRS DEVARAKOTTA HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 546. 44. SAVITHA P D/O PANDAPPA WORKING AS HINDHI TEACHER , MDRS SC 33 DEVARAKOTTA HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 546. - 11 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 45. KAVAITHA M.R D/O RAMAKRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS WORKING AS PRINCIPAL MDRS KUNDUR MATTA DANDIGANALLI HOBLI, CHENNARAYAPATNA TQ, HASSAN DISTRICT. 46. PRADEEP KUMAR V.D S/O DEVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS WORKING AS ENGLISH TEACHER MDRS KEMPEGOWDA CIRCLE, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 47. RAMYA P D/O PUTTASWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS WORKING AS ENGLISH TEACHER KRCS CHANNAPATNA TOWN RAMANAGARA - 562 160. 48. M.D. NAGARAJU S/O DESI GOWDA MDRS, BC WORKING AS SOCIAL SCIENCE TEACHER, ELEKERI, CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA - 562 160. 49. MEENAKSHI W/O PUTTA NAIK AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER KRCS SHIVANAHALLI KANAKAPURA - 12 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 RAMANAGARA - 562 117. 50. THRIVENI D.P D/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS WORKING AS SOCIAL SCIENCE TEACHER, MDRS, THANGALAGERE MANDYA - 571 405. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V. LAKSHMINARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. ANUSHA L, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/UNDER SECRETARY GRADE-I, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 4. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, AN ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, - 13 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. 5. THE SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 6. THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASS AND MINORITY SCHEDULED TRIBE AND SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, RAMANAGARA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 7. THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASS AND MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, MANDYA MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 405. 8. THE DISTRICT OFFICER BACKWARD CLASS AND MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT - 571 316. 9. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501. 10. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU, MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001. 11. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BELLARI, BELLARI DISTRICT - 539 219. - 14 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 12. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER VIAYPURA, VIJAYPURA DISTRICT - 586 101. 13. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMANGALURU CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 101. 14. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER YADGIRI, YADGIRI DISTRICT - 585 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. HEMALATHA V, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 AND R4 TO R14) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1872 R/W ARTICLE 226 R/W 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 04/07/2022 PASSED IN W.P.NO. 23355/2018, WP 22892/2018, WP 19837/2018, WP 19714/2018 (S-RES) (ANNEXURE-A) AND MAY BE PLEASED TO CONSIDER THE ABOVE PUT FORTH GROUNDS IN THE INTEREST OF EQUITY AND JUSTICE OR PASS ANY OTHER ORDER AS DEEMS FIT TO THIS HONBLE COURT IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE STATED FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 15 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. V. Lakshminarayana, learned Senior counsel appearing for Smt. Anusha L., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt. Hemalatha V., learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 to 3 and 5 to 14. 2. The petitioners have sought review of an order passed on 04.07.2022 on a certain ground that the petitioners were entitled for regularisation. A perusal at the review petition would indicate that the petition is sought to project grounds that are already considered and ordered passed. Therefore, if the review petition would be entertained, it would be sitting in appeal over the said judgment for re-hearing the matter all over again, which is not the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC, as there is no error apparent on the face of the record for this Court to entertain. If entertained, it would run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of KAMLESH VERMA Vs. MAYAWATI, reported in (2013) 8 SCC 320. - 16 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 3. The Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment has held as follows: "20. Thus, in view of the above, the following grounds of review are maintainable as stipulated by the statute: 20.1. When the review will be maintainable: (i) Discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within knowledge of the petitioner or could not be produced by him; (ii) Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record; (iii) Any other sufficient reason. The words “any other sufficient reason” have been interpreted in Chhajju Ram v. Neki [(1921-22) 49 IA 144 : (1922) 16 LW 37 : AIR 1922 PC 112] and approved by this Court in Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos v. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius [AIR 1954 SC 526 : (1955) 1 SCR 520] to mean “a reason sufficient on grounds at least analogous to those specified in the rule”. The same principles have been reiterated in Union of India v. Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd. [(2013) 8 SCC 337 : JT (2013) 8 SC 275] 20.2. When the review will not be maintainable: (i) A repetition of old and overruled argument is not enough to reopen concluded adjudications. (ii) Minor mistakes of inconsequential import. (iii) Review proceedings cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case. (iv) Review is not maintainable unless the material error, manifest on the face of the order, undermines its soundness or results in miscarriage of justice. - 17 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33728 RP No. 653 of 2022 (v) A review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected but lies only for patent error. (vi) The mere possibility of two views on the subject cannot be a ground for review. (vii) The error apparent on the face of the record should not be an error which has to be fished out and searched. (viii) The appreciation of evidence on record is fully within the domain of the appellate court, it cannot be permitted to be advanced in the review petition. (ix) Review is not maintainable when the same relief sought at the time of arguing the main matter had been negatived." 4. In the light of the said judgment, there is no warrant of interference, the petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 212