Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27079 (JHR)

ABHISHEK RAJ ALIAS ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8866/2026 · 2026-09-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:28620 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8866 of 2026 ------ Abhishek Raj @ Abhishek Srivastava, aged about 36 years, son of Surendra Kumar Srivastava, resident of Gaushala Nala Road, Near Kali Mandir, Jugsalai, P.O. & P.S.-Jugsalai, Town- Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 23.09.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 332(b), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that no one has sustained bullet injury. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-23 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-24 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.08.2026 in B.A. No.7780 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 23.09.2026 Gunjan-