Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27077 (ORI)

PRADIP KUMAR SAHOO v. UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/21955/2026 · 2026-07-21

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.21955 of 2026 Pradip Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Ms. M. Panda, Adv -versus- Union of India & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI, along with Mr. P.K. Pasayat, CGC (for O.P. Nos.1 & 2) Mr. D. Pradhan, CGC (for O.P. No.3) Ms. S. Patra, CGC (for O.P. No.4) COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 21.07.2026 1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Since the prayer made to declare letter dtd.09.02.2026 as bad and illegal and the same is not a part of the record, it is the view of this Court that the Writ Petition is not entertainable with such a prayer. 4. At this point of time, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to file it afresh after getting all the documents. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) sangita Judge