NISHA KHATOON @ NISHA PARWEEN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8961/2026 · 2026-09-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27077 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27077 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28992 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8961 of 2026
------ Nisha Khatoon @ Nisha Parween, aged about 31 years, daughter of Arshad Imam, resident of Taj Nagar Kapali, P.O.-Kapali, P.S.- Chandil (Kapali), District-Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 25-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.140 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 17(b), 21(b) & 25 of the NDPS Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as heroin and 2.05 gm of brown sugar which was given by the petitioner to the co-accused Md. Sarfraj has been seized by the police. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the seized drugs come under small quantity. It is next submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.08.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.16 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Saraikela-Kharsawan in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.140 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish her mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 25/09/2026 Abhiraj/