Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27072 (KAR)

SMT. KEMPAHANUMAKKA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20377/2026 · 2026-07-07

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34010 WP No. 20377 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20377 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KEMPAHANUMAKKA W/O SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O MALLASANDRA VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H..,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU SUB-DIVISION, TUMAKURU - 572 101. 3. THE TAHSILDAR TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY Smt.B P RADHA, AGA) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34010 WP No. 20377 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01.06.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND EFFECT KATHA IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LANDS BEARING SY. NO. 19 (NEW SY. NO. 19/2) MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 08 GUNTAS AND SY. NO. 26 (NEW SY. NO. 26/2) MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 36 GUNTAS SITUATED AT GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA WEST HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK AND DISTRICT IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN TERMS OF THE ORDER DATED 05.03.2004 IN CASE NO. INA (K) 59 / 1079-80 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AUTHORITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner in this petition is seeking direction to respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure D). 3. On perusal of the representation at Annexure-D would indicate that, the land in question has been granted to the husband of the petitioner on 05.03.2004. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34010 WP No. 20377 of 2026 merits of the case, the respondent No.3 is directed to consider Annexure-D filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, after verifying the original records in their office and take decision in the matter within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32