Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27067 (AP)

NAGIREDDY CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY v. PEEYUSH KUMAR

CC/4098/2025 · 2026-03-29

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J C.C.No.4098_2025 APHC010673852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4098/2025 Between: 1. NAGIREDDY CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O. VENKU REDDY AGE 63 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR R/O. JUVVALAPALEM VILLAGE, NAIDUPETA MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR, I.A.S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT ,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SK FAZULULLA, COMMISSIONER NAIDUPETA MUNICIPALITY NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. SRI V B CHANDRA MOHAN, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NAIDUPETA MUNICIPALITY NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience to the order dated 08.09.2025 passed in W.P. No. 21647 of 2024 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 HN, J C.C.No.4098_2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of Respondent No.l on 19.03.2026, as directed by this Honble Court vide order dated 06.02.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3 HN, J C.C.No.4098_2025 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that the amount has been received, and the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.21647 of 2024 have been complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the compliance of the directions issued by this Court, nothing further survives for adjudication in this matter. 3. Accordingly, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:30.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J C.C.No.4098_2025 242 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:4098 of 2025 Date: 30.03.2026 NKA