Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27053 (JHR)

GULSHAN PARWEEN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9015/2026 · 2026-09-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:28963] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9015 of 2026 ------ Gulshan Parween, aged about 35 years, W/o- Md. Irfan @ Ujaley @ Aryan, R/o- Yogiya Garha, P.O. Yogiya Garha, P.S.- Pupri, Dist- Sitamarhi, State- Bihar, Pin:843320 A/P R/o- Sonia Vihar, Pusta OS, P.O. and P.S.- Sonia Vihar, Dist- North East Delhi, State- Delhi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-25-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.172 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 331(4), 305(a), 331(6) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft in the dwelling house of the informant and looted ornaments, cash and other valuable documents and was retaining the stolen property. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a female. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and she has led to recovery of Rs.19,00,000/- and gold ornaments from her house. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 23.09.2026 passed in B.A. No.8850 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that she will co-operate with the trial of the case and that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.172 of 2026 with the condition that she will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-25.09.2026-Animesh/