Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27043 (CHH)

SMT. MANTI SAHU v. MAHESH GANJIR

REVP/184/2026 · 2026-07-15

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010221192026 2026:CGHC:30297 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 184 of 2026 Smt. Manti Sahu W/o Mahesh Ganjir Aged About 49 Years R/o- Village- Belgaon, PO- Jathkanhar, Tahsil- Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus Mahesh Ganjir S/o Dharmu Ganjir, Aged About 51 Years, R/o- Sevatapara, Ward No.- 8, Dongargarh- District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ---- Respondent _____________________________________________________________ Petitioner- Smt. Manti Sahu : In person For Respondent : Mr. Sudhir Verma, Advocate appears along with Ms. Anju Verma, Advocate, on advance copy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order On Board 16.07.2026 1. This review petition has been filed questioning the legality and propriety of the judgment dated 22/04/2026 passed in ACQA No. 276 of 2023, whereby, the judgment dated 12.10.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rajnandgaon (CG) in Complaint Case No. 3028/2011, has been affirmed while dismissing her appeal. SUNITA GOSWAMI Digitally signed by SUNITA GOSWAMI Date: 2026.07.16 18:40:19 +0530 2 2. Having gone through the reasoning assigned in the impugned judgment, I do not find any clerical or arithmetical error therein, so as to call for any interference in the impugned judgment under the review jurisdiction and, in absence of any clerical or arithmetical mistake, the Review Petition as framed cannot be held to be maintainable under Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 3. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE sunita