Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27043 (AP)

MUPPALLA VENKATA NARASAIAH @ MUPPALLA VIKRAM RAJU v. Sri. Venkateswara Trust Board

CRP/3674/2025 · 2026-03-17

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010670242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3674/2025 Between: 1. MUPPALLA VENKATA NARASAIAH @ MUPPALLA VIKRAM RAJU, S/O. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-23, AMBAVARAM - KOTAPALLI, CANDRASEKHARAPURAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VENKATESWARA TRUST BOARD, Redg. No. 42/2010 being Rep. by its Chairman by name Rajaram Mudivarthy S/o. Late Satyanarayana, aged about 67 years, Practicing Advocate, R/o. Sri Satya Sadan - MIG-216, APHB Colony, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order dt. 13.11.2025 passed in lA No. 651 of 2024 in OS No. 01 of 2017 on the file of the II Addl. District Judge, Prakasam, At Ongole and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings in order dt. 13.11.2025 passed in lA No. 651 of 2024 in OS No. 01 of 2017 on the file of the II Addl. District Judge, Prakasam, At Ongole pending disposal of CRP and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3674/2025 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 13.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.651 of 2024 in O.S.No.01 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Prakasam, Ongole. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the revision petition, the orders dated 13.11.2025 passed by the trial Court in I.A.No.651 of 2024 in O.S.No.01 of 2017 has already been implemented and the subject document has been marked on the side of the petitioner. 4. In view of the implementation of the orders dated 13.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.651 of 2024 in O.S.No.01 of 2017, nothing survives for adjudication in the present revision petition and the same has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 18.03.2026 BSP 5 126 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3674/2025 18.03.2026 BSP