Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27040 (CHH)

SMT. MANMATI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3619/2026 · 2026-07-09

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010267032026 2026:CGHC:29041 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3619 of 2026 1 - Smt. Manmati W/o Late Banwari Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chakdad, Tahsil And Police Station Sonhat, District- Koriya (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Collector, District- Koriya (C.G.). 3 - The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Baikunthpur, District- Koriya (C.G.). 4 - The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Deogarh, District- Koriya (C.G.). 5 - The Forest Range Officer, Sonhat Forest Range, Baikunthpur Division, District- Koriya (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10/07/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 reliefs:- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present writ petition and direct the Respondents to produce entire records pertaining to the present case for its kind perusal. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to Respondents thereby quash the impugned notice dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P/1). (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to Respondents by directing them not to proceed with the dispossession of petitioner. (iv) That, any other order/relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and just in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also kindly be awarded to the petitioner in the ends of justice & equity. (v) That, the cost of the petition may kindly also be awarded to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy for deciding his reply which has been filed in pursuance of notice dated 10.4.2026. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 3 4. In view of the aforesaid submission and the absence of any objection from the respondents, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is, however, observed that the competent respondent authority shall consider the petitioner's reply submitted pursuant to the notice dated 10.04.2026 and pass an appropriate reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due consideration to the contentions raised therein, as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat