Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27034 (CHH)

SUBHASH AGRAWAL v. SAVARIYA AGRAWAL

MCC/647/2026 · 2026-07-15

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010253072026 2026:CGHC:30121-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 647 of 2026 1 - Subhash Agrawal S/o Late Shri Ramchandra Agrawal, Aged About 59 Years, Old R/o Ward No. 28, Infront Of Warehouse Ganj Line, Rajnandgaon Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Applicant versus 1 - Savariya Agrawal S/o Late Shri Mohan Agrawal, Aged About 78 Years, Old R/o Ward No. 43 Lakholi Naka Road, Rajnandgaon Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 2 - Siddharth Agrawal S/o Shri Sharad Agrawal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 28, Lakholi Naka Road, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 3 - Sharad Agrawal S/o Late Ramchandra Agrawal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Ward No. 28, Lakholi Naka Road, Rajnandgaon , Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 4 - Smt. Mohni Devi W/o Ramchandra Agrawal, Aged About 82 Years, R/o Ward No. 28, Lakholi Naka Road, Rajnandgaon , Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 5 - Sushma Agrawal W/o Shyam Agrawal, Aged About 56 Years, Old R/o Pidkapar, Road, Bajpai Chowk Gondia (Maharashtra). 6 - Smt. Shobha Jain W/o Shyam Jain, Aged About 53 Years Old, R/o Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) Presently R/o Ward No. 28, Lakholi Rajnandgaon , Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Bennoon, Advocate. For Respondents : Not noticed. SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.07.16 15:20:55 +0530 2 DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (16.07.2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026 for condonation of delay in filing the instant application. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the instant application is condoned. 3. Also heard on admission. 4. Admit. 5. The present MCC has been filed seeking for restoration of FA No. 221/2019 which got dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 26.08.2025. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the reasons mentioned in the application, the MCC is allowed and FA No. 221/2019 is directed to be restored to its original number. The default be rectified within three weeks. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge Sourabh P.