APHC010667382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 34583/2025 Between: 1. SRI SAI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR K. PRADEEP KUMAR REDDY, S/O K. PRABHAKAR REDDY, NEAR BALAJI GAS AGENCIES, SREENIVASA NAGAR, PRODDUTUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANACE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR, DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR, DISTRICT. 3. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, APRRP ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (P.R), OPPOSITE TO PWD GROUNDS, MG ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ CIRCLE, VISHAKAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of p. 2 SRS,J the respondents in not making payments of the completion of part of work which is nearly an amount of Rs.1,88,35,647/- vide a Nidhi Bill No.2025- 9058608 even the bills were submitted on 20.07.2023, due by the Respondent authorities even after obtaining necessary approvals from the concerned departments and thereby by ignoring the sanctioned orders, even the CFMS Portal also registered our bills which are pending for consideration and pending for payments,and consequently direct the respondents to make payments for an amount of Rs. 1,88,35,647/- and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUDE SAI KUMAR NAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Mude Sai Kumar Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.01.2026 IKN p. 3 SRS,J THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 34583 of 2025 Date: 27.01.2026 IKN