Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2703 (JK)

GHULAM NABI DAR v. RAKESH HANDOO (STATE BANK OF INDIA)

CCP(S)/117/2026 · 2026-08-29

Sanjay Dhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No. 17 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 117/2026 in[SWP 1607/2018] GHULAM NABI DAR …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: None Vs. RAKESH HANDOO ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE O R D E R 29-08-2026 Statement of Facts/Compliance Report stands filed by the respondents. Along with the Statement of Facts/Compliance Report, the respondents have placed on record a copy of Consideration Order dated 21.8.2025, whereby respondents have rejected the claim of the petitioner by stating that pensionable service starts from the date of confirmation and that temporary service is not to be counted for calculating the pension under rules. As per the order of the writ court, the respondents were directed to consider the representation of the petitioner for treating his service in SBI from the date of his initial engagement strictly in accordance with the rules. Since the respondents have considered the representation of the petitioner, whereafter they have passed a detailed Consideration Order, the order of the writ court stands complied with. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the Consideration Order by way of appropriate proceedings. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR 29-08-2026 Aamir Amir Rashid Sofi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document