1 CGHC010199602017 2026:CGHC:30130 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4493 of 2017 1 - Vanshpati Mishra S/o Late Harsh Lal Mishra Aged About 55 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat Lawan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director, Directorate Of Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Through Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Infrasturcture Development Corporation Transport Department Raipur Depot. No. 1 Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Lawan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 5112 of 2017 1 - Vanshpati Mishra S/o Late Harsh Lal Mishra Aged About 55 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat Lawan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar District Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director , Directorate Of Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Through Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Transport Department Raipur Depot No. 1, Raipur, REKHA SINGH -2- District- Riapur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Lawan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. , District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioners : Mr. Prakhar Dashore, Advocate holding the brief of Mr.N.K. Malviya, Advocate For respective respondents : Mr. Abhishek Singh, PL and Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16.07.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would seek permission of this Court to withdraw both petitions with liberty to avail remedy available under the law. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission is granted. 4. With the liberty as prayed for, both petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha