Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27003 (JHR)

CHANDAN GORAI ALIAS CHANDAN BACHCHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8937/2026 · 2026-09-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:28836 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8937 of 2026 ------ Chandan Gorai @ Chandan Bachcha, aged about 20 years, son of Devashish Gorai, resident of Majhi Tola, Tripurari Colony, Road No.1, (Tenant in the house of Susant), P.O. and P.S.-Adityapur, District-Seraikella-Kharsawa. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.113 of 2026 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109 & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner fired upon the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is no allegation of anyone sustaining any injury in connection with this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.04.2026 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in connection with S.T. Case No.113 of 2026 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/09/2026 Abhiraj/