KAMAL KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/6634/2026 · 2026-05-04
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6634 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Ms. Mahima Maurya Kushwaha, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Dinesh Kumar Verma, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Raghav Arora, Advocate for Respondent-6.
2. At this stage, the Court finds that impugned order dated 27.03.2026 passed by District Inspector of Schools, Aligarh is an ex parte order and petitioner is admittedly not heard nor any notice was issued and it is adverse to petitioner since he has been demoted.
3. Accordingly impugned order dated 27.03.2026 is hereby set aside and matter is remitted to pass a fresh order after issuing notice to petitioner and considering all submissions of petitioner as well as Respondent-6 and taking note of a judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Lal Mani vs. The State of U.P. and others, 2023:AHC:237906-DB, within a period of eight weeks from today.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. May 5, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahima Maurya Kushwaha, Mukesh Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raghav Arora (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Kamal Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad