- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34042 W.P. No.21341/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.21341/2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: B. VINAY KUMAR S/O B. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.L-202 BRIGADE GATEWAY MALLESWARAM BANGALORE-560055. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHARMESH, ADV., FOR SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADV.,) AND: 1. B.N. NAGAIAH S/O NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT P H COLLEGE HULUYURU DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 2. SMT. BABY W/O B.N. NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT P H VILLAGE HULUYURU DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 3. SMT. B.N. LEELAVATHI D/O B.N. NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34042 W.P. No.21341/2023 R/AT P H VILLAGE HULUYURU DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI. B.N. NAGESH S/O B.N. NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT P H VILLAGE HULUYURU DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 5. B.N. VARADARAJU S/O B.N. NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT P H VILLAGE HULUYURU DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. VENUGOPALA, ADV., FOR R1 TO R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 20.09.2023 AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL, TUMAKURU IN O.S.NO.551/2023 IN SO FAR AS NOT GRANTING THE AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE INJUNCTION AS SOUGHT FOR RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS AND ANYBODY CLAIMING THROUGH OR UNDER THEM FROM INTERFERING WITH THE POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND NOT TO CREATE THIRD PARTY INTEREST, UNTIL THE DISPOSAL OF APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC FILED BY THE PETITIONER BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34042 W.P. No.21341/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents submit that the parties have resolved the dispute among themselves and entered into compromise and they have filed the compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. I have perused the compromise petition and the rent agreement dated 25.09.2025 filed along with the compromise petition. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in this petition. Hence, placing the said compromise petition on record, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3