Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26998 (CAL)

BISWAJIT DHALI @ CHATTU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1396/2026 · 2026-07-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.311. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1396 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Pandua Police Station case no. 875 of 2025 dated 14.11.2025 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Biswajit Dhali @ Chattu. ……Petitioner. Mr. Kallok Kumar Basu Mr. Md. Jannat Ul Firdous Mr. Rajsekhar Hota Ms. Pramita Banerjee .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Gauranga Kr. Das, Ld. APP Mr. Bankim Pal ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the case relate to alleged recovery of 62.7 kgs of ganja from a rented house which do not belong to the present petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and the charge-sheet was submitted at the extended period of time which was granted by the learned trial Court without any cogent reason. Petitioner is in custody for more than 7 months. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the seizure list. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the Case Diary and the quantum of seizure in the present case, I am of the opinion that rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is attracted. 2 As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (NDPS) 1396 of 2026 is rejected. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)