Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26995 (CAL)

MD KALAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2770/2025 · 2026-07-09

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L 5 09.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 2770 of 2025 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and/or an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Md. Kalam Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Suman Chakraborty. …for the State. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, learned Additional Public Prosecutor along with Mr. Suman Chakraborty, learned advocate, appears on behalf of the State. Their appointment may be regularized by the concerned authorities. In view of the petitioner not pursuing the present bail application, CRM(M)2770 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)