P. HEMALATHA, YSR DIST v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIST TREASURY OFFICE, KADAPA & 2 OT
WP/6120/2013 · 2026-02-01
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26994 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26994 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010666312013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6120/2013 Between:
1. P. HEMALATHA, YSR DIST, W/O. LATE P.ANJANEYULU, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC: JUNIOR ASSISTANT, JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, LAKKIREDDIPALLI, R/O. D.NO.3/199, NEAR OLD COURT, LAKKIREDDYPALLI, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIST TREASURY OFFICE KADAPA 2 OT, DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE ,KADAPA. 2. THE DISTRICT JUDGE, KADAPA. 3. GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to respondents to declare the petitioner is entitled for fixation of pay under Automatic Advancement Scheme under FR. 22(a)(i) r/w F.R. 31(2) with effect from 01-04-2002 as per document Ex.P3 or in alternative to allow normal increment which is due on 1.6.2002 as per para IX of G.O.(P) 290 Finance & Planning (FWPC-II) Department dated 22.07.1993 for having completion of 24 years of service in Automatic Advancement
2
Scheme as per document Ex.P1 and also admit the arrears bill for payment in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 76116 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 3 OF 2013(WPMP 166902 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P S P SURESH KUMAR
2. 0
3. GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING
3
The Court made the following ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks leave to avail appropriate remedies. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed with leave. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date: 02.02.2026 KA
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 6120/2013 Date: 02.02.2026 KA