Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26990 (PNJ)

JAGROOP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/20107/2026 · 2026-07-07

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Jagroop Singh State of Punjab & others CORAM: Present: - NAMIT KUMAR 1. filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated P-8), whereby (GPF)/Old Pension Scheme has been rejected. 2. behalf of the petitioner. pursue the present p 3. 07.07.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jagroop Singh Versus State of Punjab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.S.Hira, DAG, Punjab. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated , whereby his claim for coverage under the General Provident Fund (GPF)/Old Pension Scheme has been rejected. Case has been called thrice, but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner pursue the present petition. Dismissed for non prosecution. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20107-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents NAMIT KUMAR invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 22.04.2026 (Annexure coverage under the General Provident Fund (GPF)/Old Pension Scheme has been rejected. Case has been called thrice, but no one has put in appearance on It appears that the petitioner is not interested to (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India (Annexure coverage under the General Provident Fund Case has been called thrice, but no one has put in appearance on s not interested to VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.